A form-based code replaces all or part of the zoning ordinance of a city or town.
Instead of concentrating on land uses, meaning the use of the building primarily plus any outdoor commercial use, this new type of code is a legal design regulation that describes the desirable physical form, placement, size, and bulk of buildings within the environment. It also addresses the size of blocks and their relationship to one another.
In part, it's the rebellion of architects against bad
design results that occur even while conforming to the zoning ordinance.
The form based approach also prides itself on creating a better
"public realm," meaning what occurs between the building and the street.
While the Form-Based Codes Institute aggressively promotes the advantages of these codes, we could summarize quickly to say:
1. As a much newer tool, these codes are not required to be in force equally throughout a city or other jurisdiction. They are tied to a physical plan with a map, like zoning, but they may apply only to a district or part of a city. In fact, Miami is the only major U.S. city to have adopted a form-based code for the entire city.
We should note that some cities are now employing "floating" form-based districts, allowing planned unit developments or PUDs to land where they may, but to follow a pre-defined form-based code rather than the zoning ordinance regulation.
2. One of the advantages is that the code is usually shorter and less complicated than the zoning ordinance.
3. It is a somewhat more flexible tool than zoning, since new land uses are always coming into being and puzzling those who must administer the zoning ordinance. Then in a decently administered city, a zoning ordinance amendment has to be passed to categorize the new land use.
4. Increasingly, in the U.S. at least, there are no smokestack industries in a town or city, so the old segregation of land uses based on pollution, noise, and other bad effects is no longer necessary.
5. It's becoming very obvious that to resolve the woes of our transportation system, dependent on petroleum and land-gobbling roads that are expensive to maintain, we need more walkable, bikeable communities (also known as "active transportation").
6. The traditional zoning ordinance doesn't do enough to address building placement, mass, and scale of buildings, especially in relationship to surrounding buildings. There have been weak attempts sometimes, such as making the setback of a residential street the average setback of the existing homes, but this approach isn't prevalent in zoning.
7. Often zoning doesn't even deal with sidewalks, streetscape, street furniture, bicycle lanes, or other amenities between the building façade and the street.
8. Optional topics may include landscaping requirements, environmental performance standards, building material and design requirements, and signage standards. If so, usually these are written in a more design-sensitive manner than the typical treatment in a zoning ordinance, although of course this is a generality.
The disadvantages that we see are these:
1. As a relatively new tool, only in existence since the early 1980s, there's less societal experience with the codes, so the claim that they are more adaptable to changes in business and architectural practices than traditional zoning is still untested.
What will happen when there is a change in aesthetic, or a game-changer in terms of dominant transportation modes?
2. The newness of this type of law also may make it difficult to find a skilled city planning consultant nearby who can assist with preparing the plan and the code.
Examples are many fewer than with zoning, so a consultant is a necessity for most municipalities. A few lucky ones may have a staff member with experience in writing and administering this type of code.
3. One type of rigidity is replaced by another type of rigidity. It's true that increasingly the land use is completely irrelevant, because a manufacturing building and an office building can look exactly the same on the outside. A school and a prison may look exactly the same, except for the barbed wire atop the fence on the latter.
These two examples would support the argument that zoning is too rigid and detailed for today.
But form-based codes also are practiced in a rigid manner, favoring "urbanism" over the suburban look and feel, and emphasizing urban design over performance of the parcel of land. While designers don't like to admit this, they too are subject to trends and shifts of opinion over time.
4. If you employ traditionally trained city planners, who think in terms of what parts of the town or city should be used in what ways, they will need to be replaced with persons with more of a physical design background, where the important questions are the bulk of the building, how close the building comes to the street, how the parking relates to the building rather than whether there will be enough of it, and so forth.
These may be architects or simply planners trained differently. Expect to replace nit-picky arguments about whether a tattoo parlor is industrial, commercial, or medical with nit-picky arguments about ratios and street plantings.
5. Some places are now writing hybrids that apply form-based districts within the confines of the zoning ordinance. If form-based codes are so great, it's good for you to ask yourself why more cities aren't applying them to their whole area.
Form-based codes really grew from the new urbanist movement, so expect to hear about the principles of traditional neighborhood development, new urbanism, and transects (cross sections of town) if you decide to investigate the form-based approach to regulating buildings.
Common applications of form-based codes, where they are used for only a portion of a town or city, include:
1. Downtown redevelopment or improvement in the appearance or intensity of use of a commercial strip
2. A general desire for mixed-use development or specific site where such a mix in land uses expresses the community preference
3. Infill housing, in general or on specific identified parcels, or infill development of any type