Watershed planning is an alien idea to most people. Most folks don't stop to consider what watershed or drainage basin they live in, unless they stay right beside a body of water.
But if you want gleaming lake water like this, some thinking about the causes of clean water is in order.
Many types of water quality or quantity issues, including pollution from urban runoff, recreation, navigation, or water supply questions, need to be dealt with on a watershed basis.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) operates this fun webpage that allows you to determine what your watershed is and to make contact with any groups that are active in caring for the watershed.
The best flood prevention measures preserve or enhance the watershed's capacity to handle stormwater on a gradual basis, and restore the flood storage capacity of natural floodplains wherever possible.
Forming and maintaining watershed groups or councils is frustrating work, because the watersheds are often a much different shape and geography than the political subdivisions. However, it's very interesting and rewarding to bond with the people who share a watershed with you. Give it a try.
The U.S. Geological Service monitors stream levels and reports them on the basis of an eight-digit watershed classification system. The USGS provides an on-line map of current flooding or high water locations, as well as additional information you might find useful.
In an urban environment, you probably will need to focus in on a sub-basin that you considerable manageable, given the politics, socioeconomic backgrounds of the various populations, municipal boundaries, and ease of travel.
Rural folks who have a good transportation network can choose to work with a much larger geographic area of hundreds of square miles, providing that land is similar in its use and characteristics.
When you look at the websites and determine what level of watershed planning will be practical for you (a fairly large watershed, or the smallest breakdown of watershed that the U.S. government has established), set up your first watershed planning meeting.
If your neighbors don't care about the local creek or stream (which may be called derisively a ditch or some other pejorative word), perhaps you will have to change your argument at first to talk about the receiving body of water, the one into which your water resource flows. Suddenly at the level of the Colorado River or the Gulf of Mexico, maybe people who live close enough will understand.
At your first meeting, explain the anti-flooding and anti-pollution benefits of working together as a watershed. Perhaps your goals will be more related to recreation. For example, this would include a lake-oriented tourist economy or somewhere that fishing and swimming in nature is just part of your culture. Some of you who depend on ports will find continuing navigation to be your most convincing challenge.
Begin with whichever argument will be stronger in your area! It's hard enough to keep a typical watershed coalition together. This work requires abstact thinking, wouldn't you say?
While it's easy to see that watershed planning would work for figuring out where flooding is coming from, and therefore how to prevent it, the clean water and other benefits are also important.
If your heavy metals or heavy nutrient load (such as a lot of fertilizer) are upstream (near the source of the river or stream that you're using as the spine of your watershed), you'll only get cleaner and better looking water downstream when the upstream area does a stream clean-up or plans how to better filter stormwater runoff through vegetation or other means before it runs into the creek (stream, bayou, coulee, wash, or whatever you call it in your part of the world).
When you have met a few times and are ready to think about actually preparing a plan, you have a critical decision to make. If you are U.S.-based, that would be whether you want your plan to be able to serve as the required Section 319 nonpoint source watershed management plan. In other countries, you will have similar considerations about what the national or other level of government requires for funding.
Let's unpack what in the world we mean. Section 319 is just a section of the Clean Water Act. "Nonpoint source" of water pollution simply means that rather than a specific discharge pipe, such as a factory would have had 50 years ago, the pollution is coming from what water crosses over on the way from where it falls to the water body.
Typically "nonpoint source" would mean the same as stormwater runoff.
The term "management plan" is widely used in environmental regulation to describe how the government or other entity could take steps to manage (increase or decrease) a specific characteristic of the watershed.
If you choose to write a plan that will meet the Section 319 impaired waters standards for funding, the outline for watershed planning has already been prepared. It's extensive. The only saving grace is that if some portion of the nine required elements already has been written into a previous report, EPA is rather understanding about allowing you to use that earlier work.
This is definitely something you cannot complete without help from trained specialists. You might be able to convince an expert you lives in the area to help you with enough data collection to complete the watershed planning, but expect that you're going to have to pay for at least some of the work to be done.
Do-It-Yourself Watershed Planning
If you can't see that you would ever be able to find the resources to prepare such an elaborate plan, and if you're sure you won't ever want government implementation money, then you can opt for the simple homemade plan to improve the functioning, or cleanliness, and appearance of the watershed.
Volunteer groups may be able to produce a meaningful plan without the use of baseline measurements, but of course if you can figure out how to afford it, scientific help would be very useful. Often the locals, especially in agricultural or conservation-minded areas, are pretty accurate in their understanding of flooding and such, but sometimes clueless about the microbiology and chemistry of their water.
Your state conservation department or even an Army Corps of Engineers unit nearby might be very willing to help you.
We want to emphasize that probably your situation isn't unique, and that even without one penny of funding, you can create a one-page plan that would make a real difference, if implemented.
To give your planning project some publicity and excitement, plan a series of stream clean-up days. (Use the link to find a form to tell us how you did it; your photos can appear there too.) Be sure to photograph the big mound of stuff you will have pulled out of the streambank or its immediate surrounding area.
Our top two gutsy moves in a positive direction for water quality are:
The parking maximum would serve to limit the amount of impervious surface, which in turn makes that fast runoff of rain, where there is no chance for plants to filter out pollutants, less probable.
We teach people that the meaning of low-impact development is easy to remember. In short, it means that the islands in the parking lot are lower than the surface, rather than higher than the surface, as has been the style for a number of years.
It's important for large paved areas to drain into an interim location, such as a depressed landscape island dressed up with plants that like their feet wet. This means that when water ultimately seeps into the groundwater supply, it has been filtered of road oils, heavy metals, animal waste, and other stuff we don't like to think about.
So you see, just a simple three-point plan (clean-ups, parking maximum, and low-impact development) could be quite bold and also very worthwhile.
Do go over and read the stormwater runoff page for more easy-to-articulate, tough-to-do ideas that your watershed planning could implement.