Land subsidence is the term applied for a sudden or gradual sinking of land from its horizontal elevation, with little to no sideways movement.
This is a global issue, and one that is increasing in importance in the last 50 years or so. This increase is thought to be due to more extraction of natural gas and drilling for petroleum, and the more aggressive pace of pumping water from the ground faster than it is being replenished.
Of course, this isn’t much fun at all if your own community is hit. Sudden lowering of the ground obviously can damage buildings, making them structurally unsound, even if they don’t lean like the famous cathedral in Mexico City that has been subsiding gradually over many years.
Of equal importance to the public sector, underground utilities and wells of all types can be damaged. Or as the photo shows, even the infamous sinkhole causes some repair expense and traffic disruption.
Flooding can occur when the land subsidence area begins to collect water. In the Houston region, the San Jacinto battleground historic site had such a subsidence-induced flooding problem that levees and pumps had to be introduced to contain damage.
The U.S. Geological Survey has the definitive short paper on land subsidence, if this is a problem that is up close and personal to your community.
Since the U.S. has about every kind of geology, it may not be such a bad example for the rest of the world.
To give an idea of the magnitude of the problem, the Geological Survey says that 17,000 square miles in the U.S. are prone to land subsidence and that 80 percent of this condition is attributable to removing more groundwater than Mother Nature replenishes through rainfall or snow melt.
This is an interesting community issue because it is interwoven with land use planning and real estate development policy. On many pages of this website, we are urging you on to greater housing density so that development will be more cost-effective.
However, another angle deserving very serious consideration in areas prone to land subsidence is the cost of that density in terms of water consumption. In these places water conservation becomes an extremely serious issue, unless you plan on deporting some of your current residents.
This is all a little ironic, since some instances of land subsidence are inherent in geological processes over which human beings have little control.
But the greater incidence of problematic and expensive land subsidence hazards in recent decades really highlights the impact and human causes of the dewatering phenomenon. Dewatering is the process when an aquifer, the technical name for an underground water source, is being pumped faster than it is recharging.
Some of you have had traumatic instances of sinking of the earth, such as the tiny community of Benld, Illinois, where a seven-year-old elementary school built over old coal mines subsided suddenly and caused an unanticipated $26 million expense to taxpayers.
If you’re a planning commission member in a community where there is karst topography (a specific limestone or dolomite formation) or where old mines have been closed, beware. If you have heavy clay soils and are experiencing unprecedented rainy or dry seasons, heads up.
But to take on the major causes that humans can influence, watch out for water use above and beyond the carrying capacity of your ecosystem.
Map and monitor that underground aquifer system as an essential part of your land use intensity planning, zoning regulation, and hazard mitigation planning.
Evaluate whether your local requirements and ordinances promote water conservation or actually mandate water usage to maintain landscaping.
Be fully aware as you are asked as a local government or planning commission to consider drilling for natural gas or oil that you are unleashing some potentially powerful geologic risks.
These are not factors that you can evaluate through asking your planning staff, unless you have had the forethought to add a hydrologist or geologist to your team. You are likely to need expensive consultants to help you sort through the evidence presented by the oil or natural gas company’s no doubt well-funded consultants.
Just as many communities are in denial about the impacts that climate change would actually have on their beachfront residences and hotels, or their waterfront industries and business districts, a number of the cities and towns that could be identified by the casual observer as being at-risk for buildings and infrastructure to crack open and sink seem to not care.
You can wait until it happen to you, and watch the blame game and the lawsuits fly. Or you can be proactive by talking with local university or state government experts to see what can be done to lower your risk.
Somehow as planners, we’re usually on the side of being proactive.