Housing quality is what makes a community considered attractive or a place to be avoided. At least locally, it creates your neighborhood brand. In turn your neighborhood image enhances or detracts from property values and your capability of attracting business and culture.
Outstanding maintenance and compatible architecture allowing for some variety, rather than a completely homogeneous stock, usually are the keys to a great place.
If you're in a rural area and you think that a little rusty manufactured housing doesn't matter, you would be wrong. If you live in a city, that goes double. More on that in a minute.
Below are the topic areas included in this section. This article resumes after the grid. If you don't know where to click, try using the site search box in the left column or below the content.
Neighborhood reputation spreads quickly, and that usually comes from the neatness and quality of the homes. If the residential stock is all the same, people somehow get the idea your area is boring. But if there is an eccentric mansion next to what the real estate industry calls a cottage, you do not present a coherent image.
The task is to steer the right course between blandness and a neighborhood that is too varied to be memorable. All the while the housing must appear well maintained.
Not to mention, a neighborhood needs the right number of houses, apartments, and condominiums in the right sizes for the households you can attract. That stands as your challenge, whether you are a community organization, leader, or activist.
The only way to keep your neighborhood marketable is good old-fashioned persuasion. You have to convince property owners, landlords, and developers that your neighborhood is worth their investment.
As developments mature, even homeowners association (HOA) boards need to be aware of these dynamics.
Below we give very brief overviews of the following topics:
Perhaps you are in neighborhood revitalization mode because some homes and/or other buildings need maintenance, updating, or simply more buyers looking. Especially in these neighborhoods, we think that conducting a housing condition survey, even if it must be done by volunteers from the neighborhood association, is extremely worthwhile in helping everyone visualize where maintenance-related issues are most severe.
The question to ask is why the market is not upgrading the neighborhood automatically. Perhaps regional factors are bringing stiff competition or a population exodus, you have too many homes of one type, or you have a concentration of poverty with too high a proportion of low-income renters or homeowners.
Restoring communities--whether translating a good building back to its historic reference or simply repairing and upgrading--is hard work. However, neighborhood associations can really help. Check out our tips on stimulating home renovation. For awhile an information sharing exchange operated in one of our home cities. Periodic Saturday afternoon tip swapping sessions often ended in barbecue.
Then you need to look carefully to see if you can form a local historic district. That would help you prevent "remuddling" of the outside of the structures. By now, many of the potential historic districts have been discovered in larger cities, but small cities and towns may be overlooking the obvious. You want a historic district if the potential exists, because it will help preserve and even elevate property values. And it will help prevent future irreversible design changes.
As the restoration and revitalization is progressing, you'll need to take an aggressive stance toward anyone that doesn't add to the effort by keeping up their property. What constitutes "not keeping up their property" varies from place to place, of course. In some places, putting out a political sign is bad form. The neighborhood version of war might occur when someone puts an old car up on cement blocks and leaves it there, or maybe most neighbors would regard that as no big deal, depending on the culture.
Your solution could be as close as code enforcement, and you should check out that option.
But if code enforcement does not work, what you need is a neighborhood watchdog. Not a neighborhood watch for crime, but a watchdog person or committee to report on problem properties. Form a committee and write polite letters to the owners telling them just how they are violating the neighborhood's sense of propriety. Some people like this task; it's akin to the appeal of gossip or meddling.
A softer approach in a problem property neighborhood is to bring in the artists. We describe one of the fastest-growing trends in community development on our community cultural development page.
If your issue is extensive low-income demand and insufficient middle income demand, perhaps you would be successful with new infill using a mixed-income strategy. Infill is just jargon for adding new construction where there are empty lots in a mostly developed neighborhood.
Where you have the right conditions (large public buildings, highway underpasses, warehouses, empty buildings, or waterfronts, for example), you may have a consistent homeless problem. You can't ignore this; you have to deal with it, for the sake of your neighborhood. People don't want to be pan-handled, and they don't want to see or interact with the homeless, who often are just ordinary folks who had a string of bad luck.
Where you have homelessness, you may have squatters in empty buildings. This is undesirable from a potential fire standpoint. Such buildings can harbor criminal activity and stolen loot, although most squatters are just trying to survive. But do your share to help end homelessness.
If your neighborhood is faced with gentrification, meaning that newcomers are driving up residential prices for both owners and renters, that trend could drive out existing residents. You may want to take swift and assertive action to preserve the social mix.
With a mixed income approach to affordability, often you can hide the fact that there are many low-income folks and avoid the stigma. Affordable housing doesn't have to mean bad design. Americans should research European solutions much more. A distinctly American solution may be what we call the "big house" solution, where we build three or four apartments into what appears on the exterior to be a large single-family dwelling.
Four apartments in a building could consist of one large unit with luxurious finishes, and three smaller apartments using much more modest materials. In fact, maybe the large unit is owner-occupied. It's hard to find a developer who wants to experiment or do anything the least bit different. You may need a nonprofit developer when you want to buck current trends.
Another promising approach is allowing accessory dwelling units, such as garage apartments, to be developed.
Often people begin the exploration of co-housing with the idea that the shared facilities, which vary with each development, will somehow cut the cost per unit and result in better affordability. Occasionally it turns out that way, but usually not. There are other good motivations for living in intentional community and making your own extended family though.
The most common problem in rural areas is uneven maintenance, and you have to handle this with as much tact and community boosterism as you can manage. Form an organization, have a committee confront the offenders gently but firmly, and offer to help--especially if owners are senior citizens. A community painting party at a rundown house may do wonders for the look of the road.
Try to get federal community development dollars to help with exterior repairs.
If a rural community needs more than a few new units at a time, take a look at cluster subdivisions, also known in some contexts as conservation subdivisions. The housing can be clustered relatively close together with a much larger common ground at the outside edge of the development next to agricultural land or open space.
Our rural homes page contains many more ideas about adding to supply and affordability in rural areas, plus handling the over-supply problem also.
Everything you've been reading so far is relevant to you. You probably have a mixture of:
Pick and choose from the other links on this page that will help in particular neighborhoods, and browse other parts of the site as well. But the small town character page is especially for you.
1. Foreclosure Impacts
Banking practices leading up to the Great Recession caused a foreclosure epidemic in America. Sadly, your neighborhood suffers even though you paid your mortgage faithfully.
So that means that some residential properties are going to be become abandoned homes, and if there are enough of them in the same vicinity, you're going to have to endure too much vacancy while the market absorbs all the newcomers--if it ever does.
If it is a local bank that has foreclosed, you might be able to work with it to care for the property well and dispose of it quickly. For larger regional and national-scale banks, your problem can be simply finding the right person to talk to. Just don't ignore the problem.
2. New Urbanist Development
A very encouraging pro-community movement has been sweeping across America. It's called new urbanism, or the developments are said to be new urbanist.
The proponents of this movement, which can take on messianic tones, have a credo that they believe will cause new developments to be designed in a way that promotes sense of community, traditional American vernacular architecture, and walkability and transit use with a de-emphasis on cars.
This cause is all very righteous, and we support it wholeheartedly. Just don't let someone who is overheated about the matter sell you on a new urbanist development where (a) no new development is needed at all because the old urbanism is going begging for buyers, and (b) where basic environmental conditions for building are inappropriate. In other words, new urbanism isn't a good excuse for sprawl.
Due to interest in green building materials and considerations, we added the above page to stimulate your thinking on this topic.
A NORC is a community where long-time owners or renters have aged so that in their separate and separately owned residences, there is a high incidence of elderly people. The NORC concept is important because it may lead to emphasis on aging in place housing stock modifications and universal design, as well as a different palette of municipal services.
5. Tear Downs and Monster Houses
Another issue that was hot before the Great Recession, and which is resuming in some areas now, happens when you live in a nice middle class neighborhood. It's been settled for 20, 30, or 50 years and almost everyone keeps up their property. You're close to an attractive destination, maybe a newly attractive destination.
Then suddenly someone buys a lot and tears down a perfectly good house. A new one starts to rise, and it's twice as big as yours. If this sounds familiar, read more about tear downs.